In today’s world, everyone from big corporations to startups and SMBs rely on various internal structures to optimize their business processes.
And at or near the top of any company’s list of those processes is efficient contract management — after all, everyone wants to get paid, right?
Contract management has evolved greatly with the development of technology, and contract management platforms are now an extremely useful addition to companies worldwide, covering both their online and offline presence.
Icertis is one such platform.
They are a SaaS company that provides contract management options to businesses by offering an AI-powered solution suite for various business applications.
While Icertis is a strong player in the niche of contract lifecycle management, it may not be the best fit for your specific business need.
Below, we review ten alternatives to Icertis, weigh their pros and cons, and how they stack up overall as a modern tech solution.
Why look elsewhere?
Contract management is essential for the successful management of a business.
It includes organizing, digitizing, and managing all your business documents related to contract quotes, RFPs, eSignatures, and more.
Icertis clearly helps you do all these things, but online reviews discuss where the platform falls short for some users around features like integrations, templates, and customer support and training.
So before we dive in, let’s take a quick look at the larger picture.
What is Icertis’ valuation?
German ERP giant SAP has taken interest in Icertis this year and invested in it, picking up a minority stake, after which the two companies signed a deal to work together.
Although financial details were not made publicly available, the valuation is likely to have topped $5 billion.
Without a doubt, Icertis is one of the giants in the contract lifecycle management industry and is on a solid upward trajectory.
Is Icertis cloud-based?
Yes, Icertis is cloud-based and offers its contract management suite as a SaaS (software-as-a-service).
This means that you don’t have to install and manage anything on-premises, but can, instead, access Icertis from anywhere and at any time.
However, is Icertis the best solution for contract management on the market? Does it have weak points that might make you look elsewhere?
Let’s take a hard look at the facts.
Here are some of the reasons why you may consider other options for contract management besides Icertis:
Free trial and lack of transparent pricing
This may or may not be a determining factor when choosing the right tool for your business, but you can’t beat free!
Especially when it’s a free trial with no strings attached — just take the product out for a test run and see if it fits your needs before committing any hard-earned cash.
With Icertis, there is no free trial or free plan. The platform operates on quote-based plans only, delivered to you after contacting their sales team.
The fact that Icertis doesn’t publicly display its pricing might be another downside for decision-makers who love to do their own research and comparisons before they spend time on demo calls.
Being aware of how much a contract management solution might cost based on your usage and needs is a priority for many, which is why at PandaDoc we’ve decided to make our pricing as clear and transparent as possible.
Excellent usability
One of the comments that comes up with Icertis is related to its usability.
Some business owners find its software to be too time-consuming when it comes to completing tasks, and, worse, if a change is needed (or a mistake is discovered) after executing a contract, going backward to a previous version may not be possible, and/or requires customer support.
Usability and UX design get mentioned in Icertis’ reviews on G2, as well: Some users are complaining that the tool is too complex and has a steep learning curve with a user interface that could certainly be improved.
If you need a platform to help your salespeople save time and close deals faster, you’d certainly be better served by one that can be seamlessly integrated into your sales processes.
Seamless integrations
Integrations seem to be another weak point of Icertis: Although the software platform comes with a number of connectors, most of them require tinkering before they become 100% functional and can be used by all relevant teams.
Today, a software tool’s capacity to seamlessly integrate with other applications is crucial for businesses and its importance shouldn’t be underestimated — or you risk spending lots of time and resources on connecting your systems before you can even start using them.
According to Okta’s research, tech companies and large enterprises use between 155 and 175 apps on average, with smaller companies using more than 70 systems.
In light of this, it’s very easy to see how crucial it is for companies to have a contract management system that connects with their other systems instantly, be it to their CRM systems, productivity apps, or admin tools.
Templates’ variety and ease of use
Business document templates help everyone save time — business owners, team leads, and sales reps alike.
Ready-to-use templates are a godsend for busy teams, because they provide a prototype for different use cases, enabling team members to quickly start making changes to existing documents rather than writing them from scratch.
So, it’s easy to see why contract management platforms that have large template libraries are a better alternative to platforms that enable you to create your own templates for contracts and clauses — but without providing you with documents you can use out-of-the-box.
PandaDoc’s templates are super easy to fill out and you get full control of the entire contract lifecycle.
From transforming templates into contracts and sending them to different parties, to modifying them when necessary and quickly getting them signed, your template needs are more than covered.
What are the best alternatives to Icertis? The top contenders
So, without further ado, here are our top ten alternatives to Icertis that we think are well worth your time and consideration. Let’s get to it!
01. PandaDoc
PandaDoc is our top contender in the race for a suitable Icertis alternative, and one of the best contract management solutions out there.
It comes with a powerful yet super simple document editor and strong collaboration capabilities that enable team members to work on the same documents together in real-time.
Plus, hundreds of templates that you can use straight away and adapt to your own needs and branding, dramatically reducing the time you need to create a new proposal or a service agreement.
But don’t just take our word for it — see for yourself why PandaDoc is such a powerful alternative to Icertis.
Let’s first start with an overview of the basics.
Pricing: $35/month per user for Essentials, $65/month per user for Business. Enterprise plans are available as well as a free plan (which features an unlimited number of document uploads and eSignatures).
Free trial: 14-day free trial available for all users.
Ease of use: 5/5
Functionality: 5/5
Key features: Unlimited uploads, a drag-and-drop document editor, custom eSignature and document creation workflows, audit and document analytics, SSL encryption, user performance and content reporting, and 24/7 email and chat support.
Integrations: Dozens of integrations are available for CRMs, payments, productivity tools, storage solutions, admin apps, integration platforms, and design tools.
Platforms: Desktop and mobile versions available; Windows, iOS, Android.
| Icertis | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | ✓ |
| Proposal management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | ✓ |
Key features
- Intuitive drag-and-drop editor. PandaDoc’s drag-and-drop editor makes it super easy to create and edit contracts, proposals, quotes, forms, and more.
- Dozens of integrations. PandaDoc seamlessly connects to all of the major CRM, admin, and productivity tools to support your sales, marketing, and customer success efforts. Thanks to its open API, you can easily connect it to other tools, too.
- Available on mobile. Prospects, partners, and clients can easily sign documents on the go, from a mobile phone or tablet — and you can edit them on any device as well.
PandaDoc is one of the most comprehensive contract management solutions out there — and nothing backs that up like solid testimonials from satisfied users: Let our customers tell you why.
Icertis vs. PandaDoc: How do they compare?
Compared to Icertis, PandaDoc offers free trials and even a free subscription with unlimited uploads and eSignatures that allows you to collect payments, while Icertis only offers quote-based subscriptions with no free option and no free trial.
Both platforms offer Enterprise subscriptions, but PandaDoc is the more flexible of the two solutions, offering business plans for different use cases, scenarios, and companies.
PandaDoc has a powerful, intuitive editor that customers find incredibly easy to use — and which all teams can use to work together.
In comparison, Icertis’ UI comes with a steep learning curve, which can surprise even experienced enterprise users.
Why choose PandaDoc?
In sum, PandaDoc is easier to use, allows for more flexibility, offers simpler options for both smaller and bigger businesses alike, and onboarding is much faster.
And while Icertis includes a third-party integration for eSignatures, this implies an additional cost and separate subscriptions, while PandaDoc offers legally binding eSignatures with every plan at no additional cost.
Contract management software is not just about laying out contract terms on a blank page — it’s also about using your company’s branding, style, and tone of voice consistently, across all documents, legal materials, and marketing and sales collateral.
PandaDoc does all this exceptionally well, enabling you to impress customers (and customers-to-be) with beautifully designed content that is always on brand.
Plus, it comes with a powerful Canva integration to facilitate your design process.
02. Agiloft
Our second contender is Agiloft, another solid alternative to Icertis.
Agiloft is a comprehensive solution with powerful security features and compliance safeguards that enable you to build and automate workflows easily — including automating alerts.
Contract activity can be easily tracked via Agiloft’s dashboard.
It doesn’t offer a free trial, only a demo, so if you’d like to try it out for yourself you’ll need to subscribe to one of their plans.
Let’s look at what Agiloft has to offer.
Pricing: Quote-based pricing upon request, starting from $65/month.
Free trial: No, only a free demo.
Ease of use: 4.6/5
Functionality: 4/5
Key features: Contract lifecycle management (CLM) suite with customizable templates, clause library, security and compliance safeguards, flexible workflows, automatic notifications, and easy integration with other enterprise systems.
Integrations: Around 20 integrations and APIs are available; some of the integrations require an Enterprise or Enterprise Extended license.
Platforms: Desktop version available, which can be accessed through a browser on a mobile device (but no dedicated app or mobile version).
Let’s see a quick summary of how Icertis compares to Agiloft:
| Icertis | Agiloft | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | ✓ |
| Proposal management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | Third-party integration |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | X |
| Live chat & 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Contract repository and dashboard. Agiloft offers users a contract repository where they can save contracts and all supporting documentation. Activity on a contract can be tracked via the dashboard, together with all specific information related to it.
- Compliance analytics. Users get the possibility to create compliance reports and capture specific compliance-related metrics.
- Customization wizard for contracts. Although Agiloft doesn’t have an easy-to-use document editor like PandaDoc, it has its own customization wizard that lets you easily create and edit contracts.
Icertis vs. Agiloft: How do they compare?
Agiloft is a solid contract lifecycle management (CLM) solution that is trusted by organizations like EMC, Chevron, the US Air Force, Penguin House, and others.
Compared to Icertis, it’s easier to use and meets the needs and requirements of its users better, according to G2’s rundown.
It also beats Icertis in terms of contract creation, editing, attachment, collaboration processes, and notifications. Icertis’ integrations, however, seem to perform slightly better.
But do you know which software tool scores even better than Agiloft? You guessed it: PandaDoc. See for yourself what users have to say.
PandaDoc has a free trial (plus a free version!) that enables you to test the platform easily and see for yourself whether it meets your needs.
Plus, it’s a more affordable and flexible solution and comes with tons of seamless integrations to all the most common CRM platforms, productivity tools, and more.
And its super intuitive document editor makes contract creation a snap.
03. Conga
Next up, we have Conga in the spotlight.
Conga has a few different tools — Conga Contracts, Conga Sign, Conga Composer, and Conga Collaborate — which all cover different elements of the contract management lifecycle and speak seamlessly with one another.
It streamlines processes quite well and helps teams collaborate easily, even in large companies.
Additionally, Conga integrates readily with Salesforce, which is one of its key advantages, but we couldn’t find information on other CRM integrations.
Let’s see how it compares to Icertis and look at the basics.
Pricing: Quote-based pricing (no pricing info on Conga’s website).
Free trial: No.
Ease of use: 4/5
Functionality: 4/5
Key features: Conga Contracts enables you to quickly create, share, and eSign contracts. It has a suite of tools, such as Conga Sign, Conga Composer, and Conga Collaborate.
Integrations: Conga offers integrations to other tools such as Salesforce, Microsoft Teams, Slack, and more, but we couldn’t find a comprehensive list of integrations on Conga’s website.
Platforms: Desktop version available, no dedicated mobile version.
Let’s see a quick summary of how Icertis compares to Conga:
| Icertis | Conga | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | ✓ |
| Proposal management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | X |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Built on the Salesforce platform. Conga is built on the Salesforce platform and integrates seamlessly with it.
- Contract intelligence. AI to streamline your contract management, anyone? Conga offers this feature to help you speed up contract creation. With its intelligent discovery, you can also import contracts from different sources.
- Conga Sign. With Conga Sign, you can eSign contracts easily and track the status of approvals and signatures for all documents.
Icertis vs. Conga: How do they compare?
Conga offers powerful analytics and reporting capabilities, which is its strongest point when compared to Icertis.
Icertis, however, might be somewhat easier to set up and use according to G2 reviews — which may come off as a surprise, given that Icertis’ UI is not the most user-friendly one out there.
On the upside, Conga enables you to easily involve multiple review steps and multiple reviewers and is generally highly customizable.
Conga doesn’t offer a free trial either, so if you want to test it first, you might want to opt for another alternative. (Hint: PandaDoc does, and also enables you to embed images in documents and encrypt your documents to store them).
04. DocuSign
DocuSign is our next alternative — and perhaps one of the most popular contract management tools out there.
It’s a powerful cloud application that is trusted by many businesses for their contract management and eSignature needs, and because it is rather simple to use.
It connects well with other tools and offers legally binding eSignatures, plus mobile applications for Android and iOS, enabling anyone to sign contracts on the go.
Pricing: Starting from $10/month for 5 documents. Learn more about DocuSign’s pricing.
Free trial: Yes, 30 days.
Ease of use: 3.9/5
Functionality: 4/5
Key features: DocuSign enables you to easily get your documents signed (with an eSignature), integrates well with lots of enterprise software tools, and has strong form builder functionality.
Integrations: 350+ integrations.
Platforms: Desktop and mobile versions available for Windows, iOS, and Android.
Let’s see a quick overview of how Icertis compares to DocuSign:
| Icertis | DocuSign | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | ✓ |
| Proposal management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Workflow automation. DocuSign CLM enables you to build automated workflows that speed up your contract management. It features 100+ pre-configured workflow steps to manage contracts (create, sign, approve, store documents, and more).
- Integrations. DocuSign connects well with other tools and has hundreds of pre-built connectors you can use out-of-the-box.
- Simple collaboration. Collaboration is another key feature of DocuSign, with its granular version control and automated notifications.
Icertis vs. DocuSign: How do they compare?
DocuSign seems to be more oriented toward smaller and mid-sized businesses, while Icertis is certainly more enterprise-oriented.
Contract collaboration in both tools is strong, but Icertis is more customizable and easier to set up.
As for free trials, DocuSign does offer you 30 days for free — which isn’t the case for Icertis. Integrations are another strong advantage of DocuSign, with its hundreds of cloud integrations.
On the other hand, DocuSign doesn’t have a native drag-and-drop editor either, which, again, might be a reason to consider another one of our contenders, PandaDoc, which boasts excellent UI and customization features. See how PandaDoc and DocuSign compare.
05. Concord
Next, we’ll look into another CLM tool, Concord.
Concord is a simple and agile platform that makes contract creation, signing, and management easy.
It’s an all-in-one tool that you can use to create contracts, collect internal approvals, negotiate conditions with external stakeholders, gather signatures, store documents, and manage deadlines.
Plus, like PandaDoc, it comes with unlimited eSignatures for all its plans, which is a pretty neat feature.
Collaborating on documents is very easy, regardless of whether you’re working with your coworkers or your clients, and approvals are also streamlined to speed up the whole process.
Here are the basics:
Pricing: Starting from $17/month per user.
Free trial: Yes, as well as a free plan.
Ease of use: 4.4/5
Functionality: 4.2/5
Key features: eSignatures, document creation and management, and easy collaboration.
Integrations: Zapier-enabled integrations, through which you can sync Concord with DropBox, DocuSign, and more. Only one CRM integration is available (for Salesforce).
Platforms: Desktop only, no dedicated mobile apps.
Let’s see a quick overview of how Icertis compares to Concord:
| Icertis | Concord | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | ✓ |
| Proposal management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Real-time collaboration. With Concord, teams can draft contracts together and easily collaborate in real-time.
- Document editor. Concord features a document editor but also enables users to work in Word or in Google Docs.
- Custom roles. You can easily keep track of who’s responsible for what with Concord’s custom roles.
Icertis vs. Concord: How do they compare?
So, how do Concord and Icertis compare? According to G2 reviews, Concord scores better in terms of ease of setup and use, contract collaboration, automated notifications, attachments, and more — although the scores of both are quite close in most of these categories.
Concord also has strong custom roles and teams’ features, allowing you to define who can do what and group users together easily. For large teams, this is key.
Another strong advantage of Concord is its free trial, which enables you to test the platform and see if it fits your use cases, with no strings attached.
So, where does Concord fall short?
Its basic package is rather limited, and custom branding is only included in its top-tier category, subject to a cost estimate.
At PandaDoc, we believe that custom branding is key for standing out, which is why we’ve included it in our Business Package (which is at $49/month, or the price of Concord’s Pro package — which doesn’t offer custom branding).
Plus, Concord’s integrations are limited, too. Need to connect your CRM to it? If you use Salesforce, you’re in luck, because Concord supports a Salesforce integration.
If not, well, no dice, unfortunately — there aren’t other CRM integrations available (while PandaDoc syncs with the 15 most popular CRM solutions out there).
06. SAP Ariba
Another contender that often comes up when looking for alternatives to Icertis is SAP Ariba (formerly Ariba, which was acquired by SAP in 2012), which got into our list of the best contract management software previously.
Here, we have a solution dedicated to supplier and spend management and financial analytics that also has a contract lifecycle management (CLM) functionality, similar to Icertis.
In fact, the two companies signed a partnership deal in 2022 to build a joint roadmap but so far each software tool exists as a standalone solution (there hasn’t been any news yet that they’ll merge).
So, let’s look at the basics of SAP Ariba:
Pricing: Starting from $50/year for 5-24 documents and up to $5,500/year for more than 500 documents (source).
Free trial: Yes, for up to five documents. A free version of SAP Ariba Start Sourcing is also available.
Ease of use: 3.7/5
Functionality: 3.9/5
Key features: Collaborative spending, finance, and sales management; ERP (enterprise resource management) integrations; contract creation and management
Integrations: Integrations with the rest of the SAP ecosystem, including ERP.
Platforms: Desktop version + SAP Ariba Procurement for Android and iOS.
Let’s see a quick overview of how Icertis compares to Concord:
| Icertis | SAP Ariba | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | You can create your own |
| Proposal management | ✓ | X |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Team collaboration. SAP Ariba has powerful team collaboration features and allows for a granular setup of user permissions and roles
- Intelligent spend management solutions. With SAP Ariba, you can sync transaction data and financial processes to gain better control of enterprise spending and procurement.
- Contract creation. With the system’s native document creation features, users can create new contracts easily and collaborate on them.
Icertis vs. SAP Ariba: How do they compare?
So, what’s the verdict — how does Icertis compare with SAP Ariba? Actually, for a number of factors, such as ease of use, requirements fulfillment, and quality of support, Icertis scores better.
SAP Ariba, however, seems to be a better option in terms of contract collaboration and the management of attachments — and has powerful analytics and reporting capabilities.
Another obvious benefit is that SAP Ariba is well-integrated with the rest of the SAP ecosystem, so if your organization is already reliant on SAP for other processes, SAP Ariba might be a good choice for spend management.
Should you simply go with SAP Ariba, then? It depends.
The application might be a solid choice for some use cases, such as supplier management and procurement, but its contract lifecycle management suite seems almost like an afterthought in light of all its other features.
Additionally, SAP Ariba is pricey if you’re dealing with a large volume of documents, with its $5,500/year plan for 500 or more documents, or $458/month, compared to PandaDoc’s plans at $19 or $49/month per user for an Essentials or Business plan.
Indeed, SAP Ariba is a powerful option if you’re looking for an SAP-powered solution for supply chain and supplier management, but if you need something more flexible in the contract and proposal management department, then this platform might not be your best choice.
07. ContractWorks
ContractWorks, an Onit product, is a platform for the management of corporate agreements.
It has a strong focus on security and backups and comes with an AI-powered tagging system, enabling you to locate contracts easily and evaluate progress.
Users like the ease of use of its repository, allowing them to search contracts in multiple ways, and also its notification settings alerting them of contract end dates, reporting due dates, and more.
Let’s see what ContractWorks has to offer:
Pricing: Starting from $700/month for unlimited users, 2500 documents, and 5 eSignature licenses.
Free trial: Yes.
Ease of use: 4.7/5
Functionality: 4.6/5
Key features: eSignatures, repository, strong collaboration features.
Integrations: With Salesforce.
Platforms: Desktop only, no dedicated mobile apps.
Let’s now see how Icertis compares to ContractWorks:
| Icertis | ContractWorks | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | X |
| Templates | You can create your own | X |
| Due date management | X | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Contract repository. ContractWorks’ strength lies in its repository, which allows users to store and locate contracts easily at all times.
- eSignatures. eSignatures are integrated into the platform and are very easy to use.
- Notifications and alerts. You can keep track of all contracts’ due dates and your reporting responsibilities with the help of ContractWorks notifications.
Icertis vs. ContractWorks: How do they compare?
So, which one is better, Icertis or ContractWorks?
In most domains, ContractWorks scores better: Users are happier with how well it meets their requirements, they feel the platform is easier to set up and use, and the quality of support is also better.
Of the different contract management solutions out there, ContractWorks is among the easiest to use, based on users’ reviews.
Feature updates and the general direction of development seem to also be another strength of ContractWorks (when compared to Icertis).
So, what’s lacking in ContractWorks?
ContractWorks is an excellent solution if you’re mostly looking to store contracts that you’ve created on another platform and if you want to be able to read them from anywhere and also track due dates.
However, it doesn’t come with a native document editor, nor can you easily collaborate on quotes and proposals with other team members.
In other words, if you simply want to manage a large volume of existing documents and stay on top of deadlines, ContractWorks is great.
If you need to create and edit agreements, quotes, and proposals, however, you’d need to look elsewhere.
08. Ironclad CLM
Ironclad is a solid contender in our competition, with its AI-enabled contract management functions that enable legal teams to automate their processes and work faster.
Clause-level collaboration is one of Ironclad’s strengths, helping businesses create airtight contracts.
It’s a comprehensive all-in-one solution that features document creation, editing, negotiation, storage, eSignatures, and more, and its drag-and-drop interface is easy to use even by non-technical users.
Plus, it comes with an API and a number of integrations that enable users to sync it with their other systems seamlessly.
Pricing: No pricing info on their website; you need to contact Ironclad for a quote.
Free trial: Yes, 14 days.
Ease of use: 4.5/5
Functionality: 4.4/5
Key features: End-to-end contract management, seamless integrations, personalized workflows.
Integrations: Ten integrations, including Google Drive, Salesforce, and DocuSign, plus a public API.
Platforms: Desktop only, no dedicated mobile apps.
What does an Ironclad vs. Icertis comparison look like?
| Icertis | Ironclad | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | You can create your own |
| Repository | X | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | Third-party integration |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Workflow designer. With a simple drag-and-drop tool, you can build contract processes in minutes.
- Contract repository. Similarly to ContractWorks, Ironclad has an AI-powered contract repository that facilitates contract storage and access.
- Reporting functionality. From Ironclad’s dashboard, you can quickly generate reports, clear up bottlenecks, and manage large volumes of documents easily.
Icertis vs. Ironclad: How do they compare?
So, in a toe-to-toe comparison, which one is better, Ironclad or Icertis? According to reviews on G2, Ironclad fares pretty well in most categories, although in many areas it’s almost a draw.
Ironclad seems to be easier to set up, use, and manage, and to better meet users’ requirements. It also has a free trial, which isn’t the case with Icertis.
Are there things that Ironclad could do better?
Well, for one, its integrations aren’t that numerous: it comes with 10 out-of-the-box integrations, but if you need more, you need to set them up yourself — and if your CRM isn’t Salesforce, you’re out of luck, because it’s the only ready-to-use CRM integration.
PandaDoc, by comparison, comes with 15 CRM integrations, and plenty more than other tools.
Additionally, it doesn’t come with a native eSignature feature — to sign documents, you’d need a third-party application (similar to Icertis).
09. CobbleStone Contract Insight
CobbleStone Contract Insight, a CobbleStone Software product, enables you to manage contract lifecycles in an efficient and streamlined way that eliminates bottlenecks and risk exposure and helps decrease costs.
In a way, it’s similar to ContractWorks and Ironclad, because it comes with an AI-powered repository that enables users to locate contracts easily, quickly prepare reports, increase visibility, and manage due dates with a notifications system.
Let’s now look at CobbleStone Contract Insight’s basics:
Pricing: No pricing info on their website; you need to contact them for a quote.
Free trial: Yes, 30 days.
Ease of use: 4.5/5
Functionality: 4.2/5
Key features: End-to-end contract management, seamless integrations, personalized workflows.
Integrations: Open API, Salesforce integration, plus integrations for Oracle-based and MS SQL and MySQL-based systems.
Platforms: Desktop and mobile versions for Android and iOS.
So, how does CobbleStone Contract Insight compare to Icertis?
| Icertis | CobbleStone Contract Insight | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | You can create your own |
| Repository | X | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | ✓ |
Key features
- Easy collaboration. CobbleStone Contract Insight facilitates collaboration not only between team members but also with vendors, buyers, and partners.
- Contract repository. CobbleStone also comes with an AI-enabled contract repository for easier contract storage and finding
- Reporting and analytics. You can monitor contract progress based on key data points, such as due dates and financials.
Icertis vs. CobbleStone Contract Insight: How do they compare?
So, how does CobbleStone Contract Insight perform against Icertis?
The jury is unanimous: CobbleStone has higher scores across all categories, from the ease of use to requirements, and its overall general direction.
Don’t let its slightly old-fashioned site fool you: It’s a capable contender and a good alternative to Icertis.
Users seem to be particularly happy with its support and ease of use, which are both at 9.7/10. It also has a 30-day free trial you can use to test the platform and see if it fits your use case scenarios.
Is there anything that’s lacking?
CobbleStone is a pretty comprehensive solution, but its pricing isn’t transparent, so we cannot compare it to the rest of the list.
Plus, while it has some out-of-the-box integrations, you might need to build others yourself — which is not ideal for busy teams.
10. Gatekeeper
Gatekeeper is another contract and vendor management platform that reminds us of SAP Ariba because it has so many different solutions and additional modules to cover a wide range of use cases.
It has powerful notification features enabling you to maintain compliance at all times and never miss any due dates and also helps you automate contract management processes to reduce the time you spend on contract admin.
Furthermore, it has a credit and risk profiling feature for vendors, which uses data from multiple industries and news sources to guard you against risk.
Let’s first look at the basics.
Pricing: Starting from $875/month, unlimited users.
Free trial: Yes.
Ease of use: 4.4/5
Functionality: 4.4/5
Key features: End-to-end contract and vendor management, notifications, vendor portal.
Integrations: Open API, plus Zapier- and MuleSoft-powered integrations.
Platforms: Desktop version, access through a browser on a mobile device.
If we compare Gatekeeper to Icertis, what does this look like?
| Icertis | Gatekeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract authoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates | You can create your own | ✓ |
| Repository | X | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| eSignatures | Third-party integration | ✓ |
| API | ✓ | ✓ |
| User permissions and roles | X | ✓ |
| Free trial | X | ✓ |
| Live chat and 24/7 support | X | X |
Key features
- Contract repository. Gatekeeper has a contract repository to store and manage contracts easily.
- Unlimited eSignatures. The platform’s core module comes with an integrated eSignature solution and an unlimited number of signatures.
- Contract process automation. Legal teams are notoriously busy (we know!), but Gatekeeper helps them free up time and resources by automating contract processes.
Icertis vs. Gatekeeper: How do they compare?
Let’s now look at the details: How does Gatekeeper score against Icertis? Both platforms come with strong, built-in functionalities that facilitate contract management.
For most criteria, Gatekeeper fares better, according to G2 reviews, but in some areas, we have a draw, such as its ease of administration and also the overall value of the partnership.
For others, such as requirements fulfillment, quality of support, and the product’s roadmap, users seem to be happier with Gatekeeper.
Are there any weak points?
Gatekeeper is an impressive end-to-end contract and vendor management solution that even comes with its employee and vendor platform to manage all relationships easily — not only those with clients.
However, it’s quite expensive, with its $875/month price tag starting price for unlimited users — and no options for small teams of just a few users.
It’s a good enterprise solution, but for mid-sized companies, more agile and nimble software tools with more flexible pricing might be much better suited.
Additionally, its integrations rely on third-party integration platforms (Zapier and MuleSoft), or on its open API — but you don’t have instant native integrations.
Icertis is a strong CLM platform — but there might be better options out there
Overall, Icertis is a strong option for enterprise customers, but there are a few better alternatives out there, as you can see from the list above.
If you want more flexibility, a better UI, and, importantly, better support (that’s also available 24/7), your best bet would be to go with PandaDoc — sure, we’re a bit biased, but we’ve studied all the alternatives in detail and are confident that we live up to, and exceed, the expectations.
Plus, with PandaDoc, you get a free version that’s already very powerful, with its unlimited eSignatures and document uploads.
And that’s a rare feat!
Disclaimer
PandDoc is not a law firm, or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. This page is not intended to and does not provide legal advice. Should you have legal questions on the validity of e-signatures or digital signatures and the enforceability thereof, please consult with an attorney or law firm. Use of PandaDocs services are governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
