Conga alternatives and competitors: 8 tools and solutions in 2026

Conga is a revenue-lifecycle suite spanning CPQ, CLM (Contracts), document generation (Composer), and e-signature (Sign). Teams don't usually outgrow it all at once; instead, they hit friction in one part of the stack and start looking for something better there first.

Conga has earned that position. The suite holds a 4.3/5 rating across 2,000+ reviews on G2 company-wide, and Conga Composer specifically holds 4.4/5 across 800 reviews— a genuinely well-regarded, deeply Salesforce-native product.

But the best Conga alternative depends on which part of the stack you're actually trying to replace: Sign, Composer, or Contracts. G2 reviewers consistently flag "Complex Setup" and "Steep Learning Curve" as recurring themes on Conga Composer [verify — cite specific reviews], which is one reason teams start evaluating alternatives in the first place.

If you've already identified Composer as the piece you want to replace, we built a full PandaDoc vs. Conga Composer comparison that goes deep on that specific swap.

Key takeaways:

• Conga's real strength is a genuinely unified CPQ, CLM, document-generation, and e-signature suite, tightly bound to Salesforce.

• The switching driver is usually modular, quote-only pricing that compounds across products, combined with a documented "Complex Setup" and "Steep Learning Curve" theme in G2 reviews.

• The best alternative depends on which Conga product you're replacing: Sign, Composer, or Contracts.

Pricing last reviewed September 2026.

Which alternative is best for you? It depends on what you're replacing

Conga is technically four different products, so the right alternative depends on which piece of the stack is causing friction

Replacing Conga Sign (e-signature)

If signing is the only problem, OneSpan Sign, Docusign, Adobe Acrobat Sign, Dropbox Sign, or SignNow can handle it depending on your budget and compliance needs.

If you also want document generation and contracts in the same platform, see how PandaDoc compares to Conga Composer.

Replacing Conga Composer (document generation)

PandaDoc or Formstack both cover this. See the full PandaDoc vs. Conga Composer comparison, or read more on document generation.

Replacing Conga Contracts (CLM)
PandaDoc covers this too. PandaDoc's CLM automatically extracts key data, tracks renewals, and sends alerts before deadlines hit. See contract lifecycle management, or read more on the best contract management software for 2026.

Replacing Conga CPQ

Conga's own CPQ product competes directly here, and PandaDoc's CPQ is Enterprise-tier only—this isn't automatically a PandaDoc win. If you need deep CPQ configuration, compare options in CPQ software.

The best Conga alternative depends on which part of the stack you're actually replacing — Sign, Composer, Contracts, or CPQ — and how deeply you want to invest in a new platform. If you just want better e-signing while keeping Salesforce and Conga-based document generation, that's a much lighter lift than a full rip-and-replace.

Start by identifying which Conga products your team relies on, then compare alternatives against the capabilities that matter most for those workflows.

Why look for a Conga alternative?

Conga can support complex sales and contract workflows, but it can also introduce challenges as teams grow and processes change.

For many businesses, the issue is less about what Conga can do and more about how much effort, infrastructure, or additional software is required to make the platform fit their needs.

Here are some reasons to consider exploring Conga alternatives:

Modular, stacking costs

Conga sells and prices CPQ, Composer, and Contracts separately, and none publish a list price. Costs compound as teams adopt more of the suite, and the products don't always talk to each other as smoothly as the single-vendor pitch suggests: reviewers on G2 and AWS Marketplace have specifically called out friction between Conga Composer and Conga Sign, Conga's own e-signature product.

Salesforce dependence

Conga's tooling is built around Salesforce. Composer runs as a managed package inside Salesforce, and several reviewers describe it as effectively inseparable from the CRM. Teams on other CRMs, or running multiple CRMs, get a materially thinner experience.

Setup and learning curve

"Complex setup" and "steep learning curve" are recurring themes in Conga Composer reviews.

Reviewers consistently point to template configuration, conditional logic, and multi-object setups as the parts that require real technical expertise.

What users say

Conga has a 4.3/5 rating across 2,000+ reviews on G2, with Conga Composer earning 4.4/5 on its own across 800+ reviews. Positive themes include ease of use once set up, Salesforce integration, and time saved on document generation.

Recurring negative themes include setup complexity, a steep learning curve, and pricing that's contact-sales-only across every product in the suite.

PandaDoc holds a 4.7/5 rating across 3,000+ G2 reviews and was named the #1 overall vendor in G2's Spring 2026 Contract Management Grid — ahead of both Docusign CLM and Conga CLM. Learn more about why G2 users voted PandaDoc #1 contract management software for SMB.

How we chose and evaluated

We considered tools across the CLM, document generation, and e-signature categories Conga competes in, and included those with G2 data and either current, standalone pricing or a transparent contact-sales benchmark. We evaluated each on usability, feature depth, integrations, support quality, and pricing transparency.

Looking for a top Conga CPQ alternative specifically?

Teams replacing Conga CPQ have different requirements than businesses moving away from Conga Sign or other document-focused products.

CPQ software helps sales teams configure products, calculate pricing, and create accurate quotes. That makes the requirements very different from replacing a tool used primarily for signatures or document generation.

That said, document creation still plays an important role, particularly in how quote data moves into the proposals and contracts buyers eventually receive.

Consider how these two approaches differ:

• Conga CPQ is built for complex sales environments and has traditionally been closely connected to Salesforce. For teams with extensive product catalogs or complicated pricing structures, that depth can be valuable. Companies searching for a simpler way to connect quoting with the rest of the document workflow may want to consider other options.

• PandaDoc CPQ takes a more document-centric approach by connecting quoting directly to proposals, contracts, approvals, and e-signatures. This can be a better fit for teams that want quoting to stay closely tied to the documents buyers ultimately review and sign.

If you’re evaluating Conga CPQ alternatives, check out this article and pay close attention to how each platform handles the transition from configuration and pricing into the documents buyers actually receive.

Conga alternatives and competitors

1. PandaDoc

G2: 4.7/5 (3,800+ reviews)

• Pricing: Essentials ($19); Business ($49); Enterprise plans available. Pricing is based on a monthly rate per single user.

• Platform availability: Web (all devices); mobile app (iOS/Android).

• Free trial: Yes; 14 days.

PandaDoc is a document management and automation platform that supports agreements throughout the document lifecycle. Teams can create and edit documents, manage contracts, collect signatures, and connect all document activity back to their CRM. The platform's all-in-one approach is a strong alternative for teams relying on several Conga products, because switching to PandaDoc can consolidate tasks into an interconnected workflow.

Above all, the document editor is central to the PandaDoc experience. Users can work from a blank page, import and modify existing DOCX files, or build reusable templates for recurring documents. From there, documents can remain in PandaDoc as they move through collaboration, approval, and signing. See document generation for more on how this works.

Contract lifecycle management is built into the same platform. Once a contract is signed, PandaDoc automatically extracts key data — renewal dates, contract values, governing law — and tracks them without manual entry. Teams get automated renewal alerts before deadlines hit, a searchable contract repository, and AI-generated digests that surface what needs attention each week. For teams replacing Conga's CLM functionality, this means post-signature visibility is already included rather than requiring a separate tool.

PandaDoc also offers options for more complex sales workflows that you can customize to your needs. For example, the Salesforce integration and PandaDoc CPQ.

If you're replacing Conga Composer specifically, see our full PandaDoc vs. Conga Composer comparison.

Key details

• A complete document solution. PandaDoc supports documents beyond the signature stage, letting teams create, manage, and complete agreements in the same platform.

• Powerful content creation tools. The document editor gives teams more control over document creation than tools designed primarily to upload and sign finished files.

• Post-signature contract management. PandaDoc's CLM automatically extracts contract data, tracks renewal dates, and alerts teams before deadlines — no separate tool required.

• Support when you need it. PandaDoc provides around-the-clock email and chat support, giving teams access to help whenever issues arise.

2. OneSpan Sign

G2: 4.7/5 (794 reviews)

• Cost: Professional Plan ($22); enterprise plans available. Pricing per single user.

• Platform availability: Web (all devices); mobile app (iOS/Android).

• Free trial: Yes; 30 days.

OneSpan Sign is an e-signature platform focused on security, identity verification, and compliance.

For Conga customers, OneSpan is a somewhat unique alternative because its technology already plays a role within the Conga ecosystem. Conga partners with OneSpan for e-signature functionality, and OneSpan can connect directly to Conga CLM and CPQ workflows.

Moving to OneSpan independently can make sense for teams that want to keep a familiar signing experience while reducing their reliance on the rest of the Conga platform. Teams can prepare documents for signature, route them to recipients, and track them through completion without a broader Conga deployment.

That said, OneSpan remains focused on the e-signing process and the security that surrounds it. Teams will need other document generation, CPQ, or contract management solutions outside OneSpan to build a complete process. Some of those partner solutions may also have KBA and other security measures built into their onboard e-signing platform, effectively eliminating the need for OneSpan Sign altogether.

Key details

• White-labeling. OneSpan Sign is one of the only e-signing tools on the market that offers true white-labeling. Teams can completely remove OneSpan branding and replace it with their own.

• Robust verification tools. This platform offers a variety of verification methods, including KBA authentication, ID verification, and biometric authentication, and more to ensure signer authenticity.

• Specialized functionality. OneSpan Sign specializes in security, but it does so at the cost of other features. Some tools and workflows built natively into other platforms may not be available with OneSpan Sign.

3. Nintex

G2: 4.3/5 (~1,317 reviews — umbrella Nintex rating; not confirmed as eSign/AssureSign-specific [verify before publishing])

• Cost: Varies by solution

• Platform availability: Web (all devices).

• Free trial: Yes; 30 days.

Nintex is a workflow automation platform with document generation and e-signature tools that deliver similar functionality to several parts of the Conga ecosystem.

At the center of that experience is Nintex DocGen (formerly Drawloop), which pulls data from Salesforce and other connected sources to create documents from predefined templates. Teams can generate documents directly from Salesforce records and route finished files for review, storage, or signature.

From there, Nintex eSign (formerly AssureSign) can handle e-signatures, allowing DocGen documents to move directly into the signing process. The two products work together but are separately licensed, so businesses should account for both when comparing costs.

For Salesforce-centric teams, Nintex can be a strong alternative to Conga Composer and Sign. While it doesn't offer the same native CPQ or contract management coverage as the broader Conga platform, it does offer automation through robotic process automation, which can help automate other business operations.

Key details

• Automated document generation. Nintex DocGen can merge Salesforce and connected data into templates to create accurate, repeatable documents.

• Integrated signing tools. Nintex eSign can connect directly with DocGen to carry generated documents into the signing process.

• Salesforce-focused workflows. Nintex offers extensive Salesforce automation capabilities, making it particularly relevant for teams that want to keep document workflows inside their CRM.

Combine your document creation and e-signing processes into a single, unified workflow with PandaDoc. Start your trial today.

4. Formstack

G2: Formstack splits reviews across three separate G2 listings (Formstack Documents, Formstack Sign, and Formstack Forms)

• Cost: Forms ($83); Suite ($250). Salesforce-specific and enterprise solutions also available. User count varies by plan.

• Platform availability: Web (all devices); mobile app (iOS/Android) offers data capture functionality.

• Free trial: Yes; 14 days.

Formstack (FKA WebMerge) is a workflow automation platform that combines a form builder with document generation and e-signature tools.

The platform's core product, Forms, can collect information at the start of a workflow. Formstack Documents can then use that data, or similar information from systems like Salesforce, to automatically create finished documents from predefined templates. See document generation for how PandaDoc approaches this same problem.

That approach works particularly well for organizations with structured data and repeatable documents. Teams can pull information from connected systems, apply it to template variables (similar to what you'd see in PandaDoc), and route completed files for signature through Formstack Sign.

For teams leaving Conga Sign and/or Conga Composer, Formstack can replace portions of the document generation and signing workflow, especially where Salesforce is heavily involved. Businesses looking for native CPQ or broader contract management capabilities will need additional tools.

• Key details
  Automated document generation. Formstack can merge data from connected systems into reusable templates to create documents with less manual entry.

• Specialized Salesforce plans. Dedicated Salesforce tools let teams generate documents from CRM data and send them for signature without rebuilding the workflow elsewhere, but these features are configured in separate plans.

• Bundled workflow tools. Formstack's Suite plan combines Forms, Documents, and Sign for teams that want data collection, document generation, and e-signatures under one subscription. Only Forms can be purchased separately.

5. Docusign

G2: 4.5/5 (2,800+ reviews)

• Cost: Personal ($11); Standard ($30); Business Pro ($45). Enterprise and CLM plans available. Pricing per single user.

• Platform availability: Web (all devices); mobile app (iOS/Android).

• Free trial: Yes; 30 days.

Docusign is an industry leader in the e-signing space and offers a collection of agreement management products that overlaps with several parts of the Conga ecosystem. (Read the full comparison here.)

Most users will be familiar with Docusign eSignature, which provides the platform's core sending and signing experience. Docusign also offers automation and generation tools beyond e-signing. Teams can add those solutions when they need more sophisticated document or contract workflows.

Docusign Gen for Salesforce is strongly relevant to Conga Composer users because it can merge Salesforce data into sales documents and automatically generate quotes, proposals, and other files. Additionally, Docusign CLM can provide broader contract management options for organizations that need to manage agreements before and after signature.

Like Conga, Docusign relies on a modular pricing structure. To fully replace Conga, teams will need to combine eSignature, Gen, CLM, or other Docusign products rather than moving everything into a single subscription.

Key details

• A unified ecosystem. Docusign offers products for e-signatures, document generation, and contract lifecycle management rather than limiting the platform to signature capture.

• Salesforce-capable document generation. Docusign Gen can use Salesforce data to create documents and connect those files directly to the signing process.

• Modular product configuration. More advanced capabilities are spread across separate Docusign products, so businesses may need multiple subscriptions to replace a larger Conga footprint.

Want to know more? See our full Conga Sign vs. DocuSign comparison.

6. Adobe Acrobat Sign

G2: 4.4/5 (1,069 reviews)

• Cost: Acrobat Pro for teams($23.99); Acrobat Studio for Teams ($29.99). Various individual and team plans available. Pricing per single user.

• Platform availability: Web (all devices); mobile app (iOS/Android).

• Free trial: Yes: 14 days.

Adobe Acrobat Sign is an e-signing solution that combines electronic signature capture with PDF editing and document management tools.

For teams working primarily with PDFs, the ability to make major changes to otherwise-locked documents is a major part of the platform's appeal. Users can modify PDFs in a live editing environment, collaborate on files, and move finished documents into a signature workflow without shifting between separate document and signing tools.

In addition to its mainline product, Adobe also offers Acrobat Sign for Salesforce, an extension that lets users build and sign documents using Salesforce data. When connected, Acrobat users can build documents directly inside Salesforce and tie them to the CRM's opportunity staging, similar to PandaDoc's Salesforce integration.

This approach makes Adobe a useful alternative for teams replacing Conga Sign and other Salesforce-based document generation workflows. However, Adobe Sign's plan doesn't offer native CPQ or the broader contract management coverage available from some other Conga alternatives, meaning that teams may need to look elsewhere to fill those gaps.

Key details

• Advanced PDF editing. Adobe gives teams extensive control over existing PDF documents, including editing, conversion, redaction, and collaboration.

• Document generation in Salesforce. Adobe's Document Builder can merge Salesforce data into reusable templates and send completed documents directly into the signing workflow.

• Seamless e-signing workflow. Documents can move from preparation and editing into e-signature without requiring a separate signing platform.

7. Dropbox Sign

G2: 4.7/5 (2,283 reviews)

• Cost: Essentials ($15); Standard ($25); Enterprise plans available. Pricing based on minimum monthly seat requirements.

• Platform availability: Web (all devices); mobile app (iOS/Android).

• Free trial: Yes; 30 days.

Dropbox Sign is a dedicated e-signature solution with a much narrower scope than the larger Conga platform.

Teams can upload existing documents, add required fields, send agreements for e-signature, and track activity through completion. The platform also supports reusable templates and unlimited signature requests on paid plans.

For Salesforce users, Dropbox Sign offers an add-on for Standard and Premium accounts that can bring signing workflows directly into the CRM. Using Dropbox Sign, teams that want Salesforce connectivity without maintaining a larger Conga configuration can still bring e-signing into the CRM workspace.

However, Dropbox Sign's narrower focus is also the main limitation. Dropbox Sign can replace Conga Sign, but businesses relying on Conga for document generation, CPQ, or contract management will need other solutions to cover those workflows.

Key details

• Focused e-signing solution. Dropbox Sign offers a straightforward replacement for teams focused primarily on e-signature workflows.

• Unlimited e-signatures. Aside from PandaDoc, Dropbox Sign is one of the only options that offers an e-signature solution without transaction or envelope limits.

• Native Salesforce integration. Eligible teams can add Salesforce integration to prepare, send, and monitor signature requests from CRM records.

8. SignNow

G2: 4.6/5 (1,768 reviews)

• Cost: Business ($8); Business Premium ($15); Enterprise ($30). Pricing based on minimum monthly seat requirements. Flexible per-signature plans also available.

• Platform availability: Web (all devices); mobile app (iOS/Android).

• Free trial: Yes; 7 days.

SignNow provides e-signatures and document workflow tools as part of the broader airSlate ecosystem, which may play a larger role in full Conga replacements.

Teams can upload documents, create reusable templates, collect signatures, and automate common steps around the signing process. SignNow also supports document generation through its API, allowing businesses to create pre-filled PDFs from DOCX templates using data from systems like CRMs or databases.

SignNow can also integrate with Salesforce, allowing teams to pre-fill agreements with CRM data and manage the signing process from Salesforce records. More advanced workflows can extend into document generation through the SignNow API (useful for fast automation) or additional automation tools from airSlate.

The caveat to API and Salesforce functionality is the requirement for the Site License plan. This is a usage-based plan, not a monthly subscription, and the price will vary by use case. Premium integrations and API functionality are an additional charge on top of that baseline cost.

These tools make it possible to replace more of the Conga workflow with airSlate, but at a variable cost. As the standalone e-signing product seen in the baseline subscription plans, SignNow has a narrower native feature set than the full Conga platform. From that perspective, it's best-suited to teams that only need to replace the e-signature portions of their workflow.

• Key details
  Affordable e-signature solution. SignNow offers several lower-cost subscription tiers for teams that primarily need electronic signatures and document routing.

• Versatile API and Salesforce functionality. On the usage-based Site License plan, teams can leverage SignNow's added functionality to replace more of the Conga ecosystem.

• Expandable ecosystem. Teams can add automation, document generation, and PDF functionality through SignNow APIs and other airSlate products.
  

Compare PandaDoc to Conga directly

Switching from Conga is a chance to rethink the document workflow, not just recreate it elsewhere. PandaDoc brings document creation, contracts, and e-signatures under one platform, so teams spend less time stitching together separate tools and more time on the actual work.

If you're replacing Conga Composer specifically, see the full PandaDoc vs. Conga Composer comparison. If contract management is the broader need, see the best contract management software for 2026.

Ready to try PandaDoc? Start your trial today.