Best Docusign alternatives in 2026: An honest comparison

When you’re sending digital documents, capturing a valid e-signature can be critical to your business’s success, and Docusign (formerly DocuSign) or Docusign alternatives can be a godsend.

Docusign is considered by many to be the gold standard in electronic signatures and e-signing workflows, but there is no shortage of strong competitors.

However, the best Docusign alternative in 2026 depends on what you’re trying to improve. Some platforms offer e-signatures at a lower cost and remove restrictions on sending documents. Others, like PandaDoc, provide more complete document workflows and implementation times that are three times faster than what Docusign can offer (per G2’s Spring 2026 reports).

Even though Docusign still delivers a reliable experience, new competitors provide an opportunity for users to get more for their money. This guide compares the best Docusign alternatives in 2026, including pricing, capabilities, integrations, and real-world fit.

Key takeaways

• While Docusign is still a market leader, many modern competitors offer better value through perks like unlimited document sending, built-in document creation, or advanced workflow automation.

• Docusign offers more than e-signature solutions, but these features are split across multiple products, drastically increasing the cost required to build an end-to-end workflow.

• The best Docusign alternative will depend on your priorities, how you want to integrate e-signing into your document workflow, and what additional features you need to supplement your signing process.

Docusign competitors ranked

* All pricing and feature content last updated August 2026.

Why look for a Docusign alternative?

Docusign is a valuable tool if you need a way to send and sign your forms and contracts. It’s equipped with the industry standard toolkit for e-signing, including real-time audit trails, template creation, customized branding, and more.

But, while Docusign is useful, it’s also very limited in scope.

In many ways, Docusign defined much of the modern and current industry standards around e-signing. In order to maintain the standards around such a niche product, Docusign can’t add a kitchen sink of features to their e-signing platform.

Instead, the company offers tools like Docusign CLM and Docusign Gen for Salesforce as separate products that fall outside the scope of traditional e-signing. This gives other platforms the opportunity to offer more sophisticated e-signing solutions and features at lower costs.

Here’s a closer look at why you might want to consider a Docusign alternative.

Better tools

Right now, there are software tools that offer as much or more than Docusign provides for an equivalent (or better) cost. In addition to e-signing, other solutions similar to Docusign offer extra features that allow you to create and send better documents.

That could be something as simple as removing DocuSign's transaction limits or something more robust, like advanced document tracking and analytics.

The best part? Many of the alternative solutions to Docusign aren’t more expensive. You could end up paying the same (or less! and end up with a greater selection of tools at your disposal.

Because Docusign’s competitors are varied, the best solution will ultimately depend on what supplements your workflow the best. For example, PandaDoc offers end-to-end document creation that works for most business processes. However, if you don’t want to consolidate your workflow and deal primarily with PDFs, Adobe’s Acrobat Sign or Xodo Sign (formerly Eversign) might be a better fit.

Better workflow

Historically, Docusign has delivered a great e-signing experience but has largely left users to handle other parts of the document workflow on their own. Users created the document using a word processor, then securely signed the finished document with Docusign, and stored/managed it outside the platform.

Today, the e-signing landscape is different. Many modern document management platforms actually integrate electronic signature capture into an expanded document workflow that handles everything from creation through management, storage, and retrieval. Most Docusign alternatives vary in their scope of coverage.

Better customer service

One of the biggest gripes we see about Docusign is the service. Most of the time, nothing goes wrong. When it does, it can take days to resolve the issue. 

While Docusign aims to reply to all support requests within 24 hours, that initial response may not resolve the issue. That can lead to a back-and-forth with long delays between replies.

Of course, teams can expedite the support process and even get dedicated specialists with an extra support package. Higher-tier support plans are also primarily targeted toward corporate/enterprise customers, leaving smaller businesses priced out of access to the best features.

Many Docusign competitors offer better availability around support (sometimes, support is even available around the clock! and lower costs associated with premium plans so that you can get your problem solved and keep working.

What users say about switching from Docusign

Even though many customers still rely on Docusign every day, discussions on social media and review platforms are quick to point out user dissatisfaction.

On G2, which places more weight on recent feedback than legacy reviews, early 2026 rankings show a 16-point NPS difference between PandaDoc (85) and DocuSign (69). Additionally, though Docusign scores well in categories such as contract management, those scores are for Docusign CLM, which is a separate product than Docusign eSignatures.

While the issues listed here won’t impact every team, here are a few recurring themes we found during our research:

• Restrictive envelope limits. By default, Docusign e-signature plans have transaction limits — called envelopes — that restrict usage. These limits are relatively low and can be raised through additional purchases. Many users view this as an arbitrary restriction, especially considering that competing brands like PandaDoc, Dropbox Sign, and other platforms don’t have those limits.

• Modular pricing generates high costs. Docusign’s e-signature plans are only one of the solutions that the company offers. Documents can also be generated with IAM, managed with CLM, and analyzed with Iris. However, each of these products come with its own pricing, creating very high costs for users seeking an end-to-end document workflow.

• Document creation happens offsite. Teams who only use Docusign’s e-signing plans will need to handle all document creation elsewhere. Typically, teams create contracts and proposals in a word processor and upload to Docusign when the document is complete. While integrations are available for most Docusign plans, workflows can become disjointed as work is created and signed in separate places.

• Contract management is a separate expense. Users who don’t want to pay for Docusign CLM will need to pay another service to manage their documents. By comparison, document management and repository services are included by default in end-to-end systems like those offered by PandaDoc and GetAccept.

While most agree that Docusign is a solid solution for teams who only need e-signing, the reality is that most modern businesses are looking for ways to reduce and declutter their tech stack. Workers are more productive and efficient when they stay inside a single platform and don’t need to switch between specialized tools to complete a task.

For enterprise teams, it’s possible to stay entirely inside the Docusign workspace for document creation, e-signing, and document management. However, because DocuSign’s solutions are modular, teams must purchase multiple DocuSign products (IAM, CLM, eSignature, etc.) to build that solution, further driving up costs. By the time a company has purchased all the required products, costs are far higher than those of alternative solutions from competing brands.

Below, we’ll take a look at some DocuSign alternatives for individuals and teams who need a legally binding e-signature solution.

1. PandaDoc

Best for: Teams who want to create, send, sign, and manage documents from a single platform.

Cost: Starter ($19); Business ($49). Enterprise plans available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• End-to-end document and form creation using the PandaDoc document editor.

• Powerful analytics and tracking tools to let you know when and how long someone reviewed your document.

• Secure electronic signature and payment capture for legally binding contracts and secure transactions.

PandaDoc is an all-in-one document platform designed to handle everything from document creation to e-signatures and document management. Our platform offers affordable pricing that scales with your business, making this a great fit for organizations of any size.

In addition to powerful custom branding and e-signature solutions, PandaDoc comes equipped with a unique document editor to help you create business documents from scratch and automate your entire workflow. The platform also offers 1000+ starter templates to help you jumpstart your document library.

PandaDoc users can use both native and Zapier integrations to connect PandaDoc to your favorite services, from Google Drive and Dropbox all the way to Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, and other leading CRMs. You can even connect your document process to the rest of your tech stack by integrating with apps such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Sheets.

Along with email support and an extensive product knowledge base, PandaDoc offers human-powered 24/7/365 chat support so you can ask questions and get answers when you need them most.

Why switch to PandaDoc?

If you’re looking for the best alternative to Docusign, PandaDoc will be most attractive for its all-in-one approach to document creation. You can write everything in the document editor, format your documents for signing, and then save them as flexible, customizable templates to speed up the process next time.

Don’t want to start from scratch? Upload existing DOCX files to PandaDoc and modify them within the PandaDoc editor. Or, if you’re using PDFs, use our document preparation and e-signature tools for formatting, authentication, and expedited signing.

PandaDoc also offers unlimited storage for all your signed documents. Keeping these files within PandaDoc makes it easy to renew contracts and locate old paperwork when it’s time to review. It’s a huge step in the right direction for both small businesses and enterprise teams who want to automate sales processes.

For eSignatures, PandaDoc is as good as or better than Docusign for ease of use, security, HIPAA compliance, and more.

See for yourself with a product demo or a 14-day trial.

2. Dropbox Sign

Best for: Teams looking for a simple, no-limit e-signature solution that integrates closely with Dropbox storage and Google Workspace.

Cost: Essentials ($15); Standard ($50). Enterprise plans available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Offers robust signing solutions and automated workflows for fast, easy signature capture.

• Part of the Dropbox family of apps but functions as a standalone e-signing software.

• Provides unlimited e-signatures without transaction limits (just like PandaDoc), so users can send without worrying about usage caps.

Dropbox Sign (formerly HelloSign) is a simple and straightforward way to capture legally-binding e-signatures

Dropbox Sign integrates seamlessly with Dropbox, Google, and other major platforms to create a signature solution that is simple and easy to use.

Like Docusign, Dropbox Sign offers template creation options and custom branding solutions, as well as team management tools, for its enterprise plans. Some of these solutions are restricted on lower-end plans. For example, users on the Essentials or Standard plan are limited to 5 or 15 templates, respectively.

As a platform, Dropbox Sign is strictly focused on e-signing. Where other competitors provide access to robust document creation tools (PandaDoc), sales engagement tools (GetAccept), or PDF editing (Acrobat Sign, Foxit), Dropbox Sign functions as an end-of-workflow solution for e-signature capture.

If you need document creation tools, you can work around this limitation (somewhat) by using integrations and plug-ins to connect Dropbox Sign to Google Docs so that the signing tools are available to you while creating your documents.

However, it’s not a seamless solution.

As a Docusign alternative, Dropbox Sign wins points for ease of use and seamless Google Docs integration.

The user interface is unobtrusive and does a great job of staying out of the way so that you can streamline your signing process. Continue using the tools you’ve always used and use Dropbox Sign to insert signatures into live documents (including PDFs) whenever and wherever you need them.

Dropbox Sign offers standalone e-signing options that are most traditional when compared to Docusign’s standard workflow. However, native e-signing is also available in other Dropbox-owned products, such as Dropbox (storage) and Docsend.

For teams who need reporting tools and integrations, Dropbox Sign may be the best fit, but choosing this solution over other options in the Dropbox family means that users will miss out on perks like digital storage (Dropbox solution) or virtual sharing and collaboration rooms (DocSend).

3. SignNow

Best for: Teams looking for a straightforward, low-cost e-signing solution with heavy automation and integration potential.

Cost: Business ($10); Business Premium ($15); Enterprise ($30). Volume pricing available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Superior pricing versus Docusign for electronic signature send and capture.

• Comes with onboard document management tools that include access controls, import-based document generation, and onboard storage.

• Access to features like bulk sending and branding tools is available at lower pricing tiers and for a lower cost.
  

SignNow, part of the airSlate family of products, offers competitive solutions for teams of all sizes. Like most e-signing competitors, the platform is industry-agnostic and can fit well into companies of any size.

When compared to Docusign, cost is one of the big selling points for SignNow. The platform offers annual subscriptions as low as $10/month for a Business plan or $15/month for a Premium plan, and its month-to-month rates are competitive with similar products. The platform also offers a wide range of features, such as custom branding, bulk sending, and document variables that other companies charge more for.

Like other e-signing solutions, SignNow’s document preparation process is similar to Docusign. Teams can use the interface to add basic fields and signature blocks to a PDF document. Some of the fields SignNow offers can be set as variables, allowing users to upload unique information, such as names or addresses, via CSV to personalize the template at use.

While this approach offers a high level of automation, the system doesn’t support true document creation, as you’ll see in PandaDoc. With SignNow, document formatting and customization need to be handled elsewhere. Once those tasks are completed, duplication and personalization are simple.

Like Dropbox Sign, SignNow integrates well with major document management and cloud storage platforms so that you can use it with the tools you already have. Premium integrations for CRMs, along with API access, are also available on the highest-tier plan.

As for support options, live chat is available on every plan, but only Enterprise-level subscribers receive phone support.

See also: 8 SignNow alternatives that will improve your eSignature process

4. Adobe Acrobat Sign

Best for: Teams with PDF-heavy workflows or those who are already invested in the Adobe ecosystem.

Cost: Acrobat Standard for teams ($17); Acrobat Pro for teams ($24); Acrobat Studio for teams ($30.) Seat pricing based on annual commitment. Individual plans available.

Key features

• Native PDF editing tools allow for advanced customization when editing documents that would be unalterable on Docusign and other platforms.

• Limited to 150 transactions per user/year compared to Docusign’s 100 per user/year limit.

• Broad plan selection options suited for individuals, large teams, and enterprise organizations.

Acrobat Sign is part of the Adobe family of apps and is closely integrated with Adobe’s Acrobat Reader. While Reader is free and lets users view, print, or share PDFs, Sign is a paid service that offers e-signature capture, PDF editing, and more.

The platform’s most unique feature is its live editing capabilities for PDFs. Most other signing platforms we’ve reviewed only allow for limited modification of PDF documents. With Acrobat Sign, users can make live edits to PDFs, as though they were Word or Google Docs files.

However, while the two solutions are paired, their use cases and access differ significantly. Acrobat Reader is available for download and can be used offline. Acrobat Sign is online and cloud-based, requiring a live internet connection to function.

When using Sign, users will upload documents to the platform and make changes as they navigate the document workflow. Compared to Docusign, Acrobat Sign users can drastically modify a PDF document prior to initiating the e-signing process. While the platform isn’t equipped for true, from-scratch document creation like the PandaDoc editor, teams will have tremendous flexibility when handling PDFs.

Once the e-signing process begins, Acrobat Sign locks most editing tools so that the document can’t be altered. Tools switch from modification to tracking, and Acrobat Sign provides solutions to sign documents, request e-signatures, track responses, collect feedback, and more.

Finally, similar to Docusign, Adobe enforces translation limits for electronic signatures when using Acrobat Sign. While this isn’t unusual, Adobe’s limitations and exceptions around this system are notable.

Acrobat Sign is divided into two categories: individual and teams. The individual plans offer similar functionality to the team plans but are limited to one user and lack any team management tools or business-level support access.

However, all team plans have a limit of 150 annual transactions, whereas individual plans have no specified limit. For small companies that only need one plan subscription, the no-limit Acrobat Sign plan may be the most affordable option as a DocuSign replacement.

5. Sharefile Premium (formerly RightSignature)

Best for: Companies in need of secure file sharing alongside e-signatures and workflow automation

Cost: Advanced ($49.50 / 3 seats); Premium ($78 / 3 seats); Virtual Data Room ($207.9 / 5 seats). Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• All plans include Sharefile storage with file encryption, syncing, and versioning.

• 3-seat minimums make plans costly for solo users but highly affordable for teams who can fill the seats.

• Offers key integrations, bulk sending, and branding options without enterprise-level pricing.

Sharefile is Citrix’s all-in-one storage and e-signing plan for business customers. The platform's e-signature solution, RightSignature, was consolidated into the Sharefile ecosystem in 2023 and has since become available across higher-tier plans.

As a platform, Sharefile is primarily built as a document management system designed to facilitate document storage, sharing, and collaboration. Teams can create client portals, sync files across multiple workspaces, encrypt documents, integrate with external software, and more in order to manage digital paperwork.

For teams searching for a system focused primarily on document management, Sharefile is a great solution. The per-seat cost is low, and Citrix provides document storage, sharing, and security features that aren’t commonly seen in other e-signing solutions.

Compared to Docusign, Sharefile’s document workflow is relatively similar. Users upload documents to Sharefile, use a drag-and-drop tool to place signature fields inside the document, and then send that document via email to the customer for a streamlined signing experience.

Critically, ShareFile’s emphasis on document management is what sets it apart from DocuSign and other solutions. The platform’s e-signing process is standard and secure, but it’s not positioned as the highlight of the product. Users seeking a standalone e-signing solution will have better luck with other options, as accessing Sharefile’s e-signing process practically requires a migration to the platform.

For teams who like the appeal of Sharefile’s document-first focus but don’t want the ecosystem, Dropbox (not Dropbox Sign!) offers the closest comparison by cost. DocSend — also a Dropbox company — is the closest by experience. In both cases, users get access to data storage, file sharing, and e-signing but will miss some of the advanced security and collaboration features that Sharefile provides.

Teams who are focused less on e-signatures and more on client experience will find value with Sharefile. With full seats, the most expensive plan is roughly $14/month per user, which makes it an affordable document management solution for teams that need it.

6. SignRequest

Best for: Small businesses and freelancers seeking simple, affordable, legally binding e-signatures.

Cost: Professional (€9); Business (€15). Seat pricing based on monthly commitment.

Key features

• Offers the most cost-effective plans of any major Docusign competitor we reviewed.

• Custom branding, signer attachments, and bundled document sends are available in the basic plan.

• One of the cheapest ways to access bulk send options, which rely on API credits (starting at €0.50 per document).

SignRequest is an e-signature platform focused on providing a simple and straightforward signing solution for teams of every size. Much like Docusign, SignRequest allows users to upload a file, create fields on the document using a drag-and-drop tool, and email documents for a signature.

The biggest difference between SignRequest and many other options on our list comes down to cost. At €9/$11 per month for the Professional Plan, a single user has all the tools necessary to create legally-binding e-signatures for a low cost.

SignRequest also allows users to send an “unlimited” number of documents. However, this is monitored by a “fair use” policy, which SignRequest determines based on the average send volume of all accounts. 

SignRequest defines “high volume sending” as an account sending more than twice the documents of an average user. Teams that fall into that category will need to purchase an add-on to accommodate that volume. However, when compared to Docusign, default costs are so low that highly active teams can pay for the document bundle and still save money.

Also unique to this platform is the abbreviated workflow. The SignRequest signature process takes place inside a single window. Teams will upload a document, add an email contact and message, and prepare the document for e-signature in a single window. Most signing tools use three or four separate screens for this process, but SignRequest handles almost everything without “next” buttons or additional page loads.

SignRequest users on the Business plan will also have access to API developer tools, but tokens are sold separately at around €0.50 per document. Premium integrations are also available, but native CRM integrations are largely absent and require Zapier connections.

For teams that want to capture signatures quickly without specialized tools or features, SignRequest is a great place to start.

7. Signeasy

Best for: Teams seeking affordable e-signing with integrated AI, document management, and collaboration workflows.
Cost: Personal ($10); Business ($20); Business Pro ($30). Custom plans available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Emphasizes AI-based contract management and offers a variety of signing methods — including offline signing.

• Limited integrations and lack of a payment gateway force reliance on third-party systems and solutions.

• Robust support options compared to Docusign.

Signeasy tries to differentiate itself from Docusign by offering affordable contract management and e-signing coupled with AI-based data extraction and workflow automation.

While this isn’t exclusive to Signeasy (PandaDoc also offers contract management, eSigning, AI data extraction, and workflow automation, it’s a unique twist to contract management that Docusign only offers to users on IAM e-signing plans.

Signeasy also provides many desirable features, including offline electronic signing and in-person signature collection, access from any device, a digital audit trail, and the ability for signers to attach supporting documents.

However, the plans come with a few downsides, particularly with the lack of payment and desirable integrations. The platform offers native integrations with Microsoft Teams, Outlook, and Google Workspace but only integrates with HubSpot, having discontinued its Salesforce integration in 2026.

Further, the offer of unlimited document signing may be a misnomer due to the “fair use” restrictions that aren’t clearly defined in their terms of service. While this won’t be a major issue for most users and is likely used to curtail spam (PandaDoc has something similar under its Acceptable Use Policy), be aware that Signeasy reserves the right to limit sends and usage at its sole discretion.

For support, Signeasy offers robust outreach options, including chat, email, and priority support, as well as a knowledge base and a dedicated CSM on higher-end plans. Hours and response times vary by outreach method, and the most responsive options are limited to higher-tier plans.

8. OneSpan Sign (formerly eSignLive)

Best for: Enterprise organizations and regulated industries that require additional verification and compliance tools.

Cost: Professional ($22). Enterprise plans available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Offers 1000 documents sent per year, compared to the 100/year limit from Docusign.

• Combines with strong identity assurance software to ensure that signers are who they say they are.

• Offers open API and SDKs for fast integrations (Enterprise Plans only.

OneSpan Sign focuses on offering legally binding, compliant digital signatures alongside a strong user experience for senders, signers, and administrators. The platform highlights its globally distributed servers, transparent, cost-effective solution, and comprehensive auditing as its major selling points.

Like many of the Docusign alternatives on our list, OneSpan Sign gets the basics right. However, the platform follows a relatively linear signing process. It’s not possible to create advanced workflows or generate team or public comments on a document.

OneSpan Sign offers e-Signature solutions and some limited integrations. For Enterprise plans, an API and SDK solution is available for enterprise-level brands who want to fully white-label OneSpan Sign and repackage it as part of their own product.

That’s important because this solution is clearly targeted toward developers and teams that want to operate at scale using the API integrations and other identity-based solutions that define the OneSpan brand. Overall, OneSpan Sign is a great contender for larger businesses and will excel in environments where it can be deployed at scale.

Smaller companies may be able to make use of the Professional Plan, but they may feel more at home with similar services offered by other platforms.

9. eSignly

Best for: Small teams seeking flexible pricing based on user permissions.

Cost: Professional ($10); Business ($20); Enterprise ($30). Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Plan pricing is based on user roles; you can create interesting plan configurations to save money.

• Built with team configurations in mind, allowing each plan tier to have a role in your organization.

• Templates are limited on every plan, including Enterprise.

If you’re looking for a fast and affordable electronic signature solution, eSignly is one of the best for cost, as one of the platform’s big standouts for eSignly has to do with its pricing structure.

Most platforms put all team members on the same plan to work together. In most cases, teams don’t have a choice. If the company signs up for the Business plan, then every additional seat is simply attached to that plan at the standard seat rate.

With eSignly, things work a little differently. Teams need at least one administrator, but other members can join on lower-tier plans appropriate for their required permissions. For example, a small business might have one eSignly administrator on the Business plan ($20/month), while all standard signers join on the Professional plan ($10/month), since they only need to sign and don’t need administrator features.

Additionally, eSignly’s user-friendly interface makes document signing a breeze. The platform offers a fast, easy way to sign — and that’s all. Rather than adding new features or trying to be more than it’s designed to be, eSignly provides a fast way to e-sign documents and leaves the rest up to the user.

In some ways, this platform might feel like a minimalist solution for teams wanting to do more with their documents than simply collect e-signatures. However, if that’s your only goal, they’re a great, low-cost option.

Finally, while the team configuration options are unique, you might find eSignly short on other essentials. The platform offers little in the way of native integrations. Instead, integrations are handled through API add-ons and are only available via the Enterprise plan (a separate subscription is also required). 

API restrictions won’t be a drawback if you’re trying to keep your signing workflow centralized to eSignly. Unfortunately, it can hamper productivity if you’re accustomed to handing documents seamlessly between CRM apps and other productivity tools, like what you might find with PandaDoc’s two-way syncing for Salesforce.

10. Xodo Sign (formerly eversign)

Best for: Teams seeking affordable e-signing with PDF editing options.

Cost: Basic ($10); Professional ($16); Professional Plus. Enterprise plans available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Offers core e-signing features and unlimited document sends from the basic level to enterprise.

• Templates, bulk sends, and API calls are limited across every plan except the Enterprise plan.

• PDF editing allows users to make changes to documents without leaving the platform.

Xodo Sign (formerly eversign) is a great option for both personal and professional users. Users on the basic plan can prepare, send, and sign an unlimited number of documents, while those on the Professional plan gain access to the document editor.

While Xodo Sign has some overlap with Docusign, the platform moves quickly in a new direction. For example, Xodo Sign’s Professional plan ($16/month) offers unlimited templates, embedded e-signing solutions, branding options, and more that Docusign users would need to pay double (or more) to access.

Advanced PDF editing is also a new addition to the Professional plan. Using the built-in editor, Xodo Sign users can edit PDFs, add/remove/reorder pages, redact content, and insert shapes or stamps. The editor isn’t as powerful as PandaDoc's tools, and it isn’t meant for from-scratch document creation. However, it’s aimed primarily at PDFs and competes on price with Adobe Acrobat Sign.

Similar to Docusign, Xodo Sign offers solutions for bulk sending and ways to authenticate users via SMS. This approach isn’t as extensive as more sophisticated identity verification solutions offered by PandaDoc or OneSpan Sign, but it’s a fast, reliable way to add extra verification outside of emails. 

While the Professional plan has some limitations, many of its features are unique or unavailable on other platforms. For example, many e-signing solutions only offer API access as part of a separate plan or lock APIs behind enterprise pricing. Xodo Sign makes API limited access available to Professional users, allowing them to test live usage in a small capacity and without a secondary plan.

Overall, the unique arrangement of features and editing functionality makes Xodo Sign a fun fit for users who want a slightly different toolkit.

11. Foxit eSign (formerly eSign Genie)

Best for: Teams managing high volumes of PDF documents that need advanced e-signing workflows.

Cost: eSign Essentials ($120); eSign Business ($1,500). Seat pricing reflects annual commitment and seat minimums.

Key features

• Plan purchase is based on annual transaction limits, meaning that this plan expires or resets if the transaction limit is reached before the expiry date.

• Offers signable web forms, signer attachments, HIPAA compliance, and other features at a lower cost when compared to Docusign.

• It does not include a PDF editor, which is a separate purchase, but it enables e-signing within the Foxit PDF Editor if both Editor and eSign are purchased.

Foxit eSign (formerly eSign Genie) has always been a popular alternative to both Docusign and Adobe. Although the products are split, it’s possible to access a PDF editor with functionality similar to Adobe and a secure e-signing tool that rivals Docusign.

Users considering this route should expect competitive pricing, as the combined cost for both the PDF editor and e-signing is $250 per user/year. In exchange, users get access to a versatile PDF editor and an e-signing platform with 250 envelopes — over double what Docusign provides when compared with standard signature plans.

For users who don’t need the PDF editor, Foxit is a clear winner on cost. At $120 per user/year, the eSign Essentials plan offers 250 envelopes per year, which is far more cost-effective than Docusign’s standard 100 envelopes.

Additionally, eSign Essentials lets you collect payments, send documents in bulk, and manage workflow routing. Some of these features require more expensive Docusign plans, which makes the cost difference even more noticeable.

However, there are a few caveats and downsides to Foxit that are worth considering.

Most importantly, Foxit’s eSign Essentials plan follows a transaction-based usage strategy with one key difference: The plan expires after 12 months or when the transaction limit is reached. There is no option to purchase additional envelopes, meaning that users will need to purchase the plan again.

If you’re anticipating high usage, the eSign Business plan offers unlimited transactions, integrations, and more. Unfortunately, this plan has a 5-seat minimum, spiking the price to $1,500/year and placing it well out of reach for many smaller teams.

For those who can fill the seats, eSign Business is relatively reasonable at $25 per user/month. On this plan, users get unlimited envelopes and templates, plus custom branding and all available integrations.

Unfortunately, integrations are a major shortfall with Foxit. While Foxit eSign integrates with Foxit PDF, the platform offers little connectivity as part of the plan itself. Instead, Foxit keeps most connectors locked behind a paid add-on—Foxit Connectors—which offers integrations with 39 platforms. These integrations are largely tied to cloud storage, HR, and payroll systems, so sales teams seeking CRM integrations won’t benefit.

The problem is the cost. Foxit Connectors costs $550 per user/year, meaning that teams who need to connect to external platforms will pay extremely high costs for that added versatility. If adding connectors, Foxit quickly prices itself out of competition with Docusign, as the monthly cost for a single user rises from $10/month to $56/month. Since Docusign includes most integrations with e-signing plans, users who need connectivity may look elsewhere.

All that said, Foxit is great as a standalone product. The larger envelope limits far outweigh the downsides, especially when compared to Docusign. Of course, you can also avoid transaction limits and most integration costs by using a platform like PandaDoc that doesn’t implement envelope limits or sending thresholds and includes many popular integrations at little or no additional cost.

12. Youtrust (Yousign)

Best for: European brands seeking eIDAS-compliant electronic signature solutions.

Cost: One ($8); Plus ($23); Pro ($38). Enterprise pricing available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Electronic signatures align with eIDAS, which is important for users seeking clear compliance in regions governed by those standards.

• In-person signing is available on all plans (including Free), so you can always sign documents face-to-face.

• Advanced electronic signature options, including AES and QES, are only available as add-ons for the Plus and Pro plans.

Youtrust/Yousign positions itself as the go-to e-signature solution designed for European e-signing compliance. Compared to Docusign, the company offers e-signing at a much lower cost and offers unlimited e-signing options on the Plus and Pro plan.

However, as a brand aiming for eIDAS compliance, their e-signature offering is highly focused on the type of signature that users receive. That’s important, because it’s different from what users will see with Docusign and other Docusign competitors.

By default, Youtrust offers Simple eSignatures (SES), which are the most basic form of e-signing (more on that here). While they are legally binding in many instances, basic e-signatures lack the additional security measures found in Advanced Electronic Signatures (AES) and Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES).

This is tricky and can be confusing for users unfamiliar with eIDAS definitions because it seems like Docusign offers more robust security validation. However, the processes are roughly the same. For its default offering, Youtrust offers email-based verification, audit trails, two-factor authentication, and other tools to validate signers.

When purchasing the AES add-ons, teams can trigger identity verification procedures similar to KYC/KYB processes found on other platforms. QES adds another layer of protection with video and facial verification, providing the highest level of security in the e-signing process.

Despite these robust security options, it’s worth remembering that Youtrust still competes in other areas. As an e-signing tool, the platform still follows the standard process used by most Docusign competitors. Users will upload a document, prepare it for signature capture using drag-and-drop tools, and send it to signers.

By comparison, Youtrust falls short on integrations and advanced features. The platform integrates primarily with Zapier and HubSpot, has strict limitations on bulk sending, and offers email support across all plans. Users on higher-tier solutions have no access to CSMs, phone support, or live chat.

This platform is great for users seeking strict EU-based e-signing compliance at a lower cost, but teams looking for end-to-end document workflows will need to seek other solutions.

13. GetAccept

Best for: Sales teams that want to consolidate sales flows, buyer engagement tools, and e-signatures into a single platform.

Cost: eSign ($25); Professional ($49). Enterprise pricing available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• A healthy mix of e-signing and sales tools makes this platform ideal for sales teams but less attractive for other departments.

• Sales-focused engagement tools include solutions for collaboration, communication, and media management.

• Higher-end plans lean heavily into AI by offering an AI editor, meeting summaries, AI-based content generation, and similar tools.

In many ways, GetAccept competes more with PandaDoc or Proposify than Docusign. The platform is best defined as a digital sales solution rather than an e-signing tool, and it offers a wide range of features to help sales reps expedite the dealmaking process.

Similar to PandaDoc, GetAccept offers a live document editor, collaborative workspaces, sales automation, e-signing, and more. There are a few key differences between the two solutions. PandaDoc has a more polished editor and suits use across multiple departments, while GetAccept focuses heavily on sales engagement and offers features specialized for those roles.

Compared to Docusign, e-signing is just one small portion of the product and is included in the base plan. However, GetAccept’s process is more expansive. For example, users can upload content to prepare it for e-signing, or they can create a document from scratch using the GetAccept editor. Signing workflows and sending automation are similar, but GetAccept offers better functionality around reminders and follow-ups, allowing users to set a specific cadence based on user actions.

Platform costs are highly affordable, even at the entry level. The Standard eSign plan offers unlimited signatures and access to the document editor, plus basic branding and engagement tools. For comparison, Docusign users paying the same cost will find themselves on the Standard plan, restricted to 100 sends per year, and capped at 10 sends per month.

The mid-grade Professional plan creates a roadblock for smaller teams, as it carries a five-seat minimum. That’s disappointing, because that’s where GetAccept opens up. Users on this plan get access to AI tools, full editor functionality, integration options, and more.

Docusign users looking to switch will need to be aware of key limitations based on how GetAccept gates its features. To illustrate: Docusign users on the Business Pro plan ($45/month, 1 seat) can collect payments as part of the e-signing process, but GetAccept places payment integrations in its Enterprise tier. Users on the Professional plan ($245/month, 5 seats) can purchase these integrations as an add-on, further increasing costs.

Before switching, consider where GetAccept places essential features and whether swapping platforms makes sense. Alternatively, consider switching to PandaDoc, where payment integrations, full editor access, and unlimited e-signing are available on the Business plan ($49/month, 1 seat) at a much lower cost.

14. DocSend

Best for: Companies seeking to combine room-based collaboration tools with e-signing solutions.

Cost: Personal ($10); Standard ($45); Advanced ($150 / 3 seats); Advanced Data Rooms ($180 / 3 seats). Enterprise pricing available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Send, share, and sign documents while maintaining total control over file visibility and access.

• A branded document viewer and custom subdomain give you better control over the customer marketing experience.

• Link-based sending features provide additional granular control over sharing and access.

When compared to Docusign, DocSend by Dropbox is a unique platform that is focused more on safe sending and access, rather than capturing electronic signatures. E-signing is an important part of the platform, but DocSend maintains a privacy focus that surpasses most other options.

The difference is best made by a simple comparison. When someone sends a file via email attachment, they no longer control it. The recipient can forward it to others, send it to competitors, or expose sensitive information that should remain confidential. For sales quotes or contracts, sending multiple versions can cause confusion and slow the sales process.

DocSend tries to solve these problems by helping teams stay in control of their data. Files are added to a dedicated workspace—similar to PandaDoc’s own virtual data rooms—and DocSend users can send invites and grant access to specific individuals. Notifications and analytics also help DocSend users better understand how participants visited a room and engaged with its contents.

DocSend security also operates at multiple layers. First, recipients need access in order to see the documents. Upon entry, DocSend users can prompt visitors to sign an NDA before any documents are visible. Uploaded documents can also be watermarked, and downloads can be restricted.

From a security and performance perspective, digital signature validation is almost an afterthought. DocSend uses drag-and-drop tools to help users convert files into legally binding documents. Meanwhile, sharing and access are handled through other platform workflows. 

Pricing is competitive with Docusign on the low end (limited features), but the Advanced and Enterprise Plans may not make sense for users who won’t leverage the other features that the DocSend platform provides.

15. DottedSign

Best for: Individuals and teams seeking a per-document or API-based approach to e-signature collection

Cost: Pro ($8); Business (Variable); Enterprise plan available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Key features

• Simple e-signing options for users who need to capture signatures and don’t need administrative tools.

• Task-based e-signing flows allow teams to pay up front for estimated usage.

• API access doesn’t cost extra and is combined with task-based pricing.

DottedSign’s primary differences with Docusign and other competitors comes down to how it approaches pricing and access to its features. While the setup is initially counterintuitive, it can be highly advantageous in specific situations.

As a platform, DottedSign offers a similar e-signing experience to Docusign. Users upload documents, prepare them for signing, and capture e-signatures from recipients. Integrations are limited but can be greatly expanded via Zapier connectors, and advanced features like bulk sending or custom branding are available on higher-end plans.

However, DottedSign's differentiator is its plans. 

The Pro plan functions like a standard e-signing plan. It’s a cost-effective alternative to Docusign, offers the ability to sign an unlimited number of documents and provides access to the basic signing workflow. Docusign users looking to switch will find an advantage with the Pro plan due to its much lower costs and unlimited sending.

Things change drastically with the Business plan.

With Business, teams select the number of “signature tasks” — the number of documents they plan to send/complete — that they are likely to use in a year, and cost is based on that number. For example, the entry-level Business plan is $200/year for 100 signature tasks.Initially, this may feel like a complete shift from the Pro plan, which is determined by seat. After all, a user on the Pro plan could theoretically send more than 100 documents for half the cost of the Pro plan.

The difference comes down to the features in the Business plan that make it much easier for companies to use. While Pro is limited to one user, companies using the Business plan can have an unlimited number of users at no additional cost. Teams can also create unlimited templates, automate task management and document exports, change roles and permissions, and more.

For teams, Business is the obvious choice because it allows the number of documents to be split across multiple users. Teams can also use access permissions and controls to share resources, keep track of usage, and automate processes.

Perhaps more importantly: Teams on the Business plan gain access to the DottedSign API at no additional cost. The API has unlimited usage, allowing teams to configure the API in the way that makes sense for their business flow, but signing calls are drawn from the same task pool as all other documents.

For teams that need API and team management solutions but want to avoid the high per-seat costs associated with adding a large number of users to a platform, DottedSign provides a formidable solution at a much lower cost.

Cheapest Docusign alternatives

Although Docusign pricing is affordable, there are some low-cost, Docusign alternatives worth investigating if you’re on a tight budget.

1. DocHub

Cost: Basic ($8); Pro ($12). Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

DocHub is largely set up for PDFs, featuring tools including online annotation and the ability to merge those types of files. The platform (full review here) offers a simple drag-and-drop interface for creating docs and forms and supports a wide range of formats including DOC, PPT, XLS, TXT, and DOCX.

Users can work on both desktop and mobile, with every edit automatically saved to the cloud. That versatility makes DocHub ideal for collaboration, as users can set permissions for others to edit and sign, or simply make a document public.

The only integrations are Google and Dropbox, and DocHub doesn’t include many of the more advanced tools that programs like Docusign or PandaDoc can provide. Payment collection, document analytics, and custom branding are absent in this platform.

2. CocoSign

Cost: Essential ($8); Professional ($15); Business ($25). Enterprise pricing available. Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

CocoSign is an affordable e-signature platform that both emphasizes document management and electronic signatures. In addition to sending documents for digital signature, CocoSign includes tools to assist with file organization and document tracking.

On higher-end plans, users have access to more advanced tools. For example, teams on the Business plan can create folders to help organize their files, leverage bulk sending, and activate two-step authentication for the e-signing process.

Unfortunately, CocoSign falls behind with connectivity. While Zapier expands its connection options, native integrations with CRMs, sales platforms, and other business applications are limited when compared to larger competitors.

3. Fill

Cost: Basic ($8.33); Plus ($16.67); Pro (29.17). Seat pricing based on annual commitment.

Fill is e-signature and contract management software that works on any device, enabling team collaboration to create documents and forms online. Teams can send and collect signatures from customers in real time via email and text message, and get notified when a recipient annotates or signs.

Users can also import documents or customize templates with drag-and-drop editing and speed up workflows with reusable templates and sharing links to fillable forms. When sending, teams can add ten separate documents to an envelope, but note that setting a signing order (included for free on both PandaDoc and Docusign) is only available starting at the mid-tier Plus plan.

For integrations, Fill primarily connects with Google Workspace and Dropbox. API solutions are also available for $34.99/month. The Pro plan also includes default HIPAA compliance at no extra cost, which is highly valuable for brands in the healthcare space.

Disclaimer

Parties other than PandaDoc may provide products, services, recommendations, or views on PandaDoc’s site (“Third Party Materials”). PandaDoc is not responsible for examining or evaluating such Third Party Materials, and does not provide any warranties relating to the Third Party Materials. Links to such Third Party Materials are for your convenience and does not constitute an endorsement of such Third Party Materials.